Swinney Unveils New Blueprint for Indyref: SNP Majority as the Deciding Factor
First Minister John Swinney has laid out a fresh strategy for pursuing a Scottish independence referendum, proposing that a majority of Scottish National Party (SNP) MSPs in the Scottish Parliament should serve as the key trigger for a new vote. This significant shift in approach signals a pragmatic, albeit potentially controversial, recalibration of the SNP's long-standing demand for a legally binding public consultation on Scotland's constitutional future.
Speaking to the BBC’s Sunday Show, Swinney articulated his vision for how the SNP, currently the dominant force at Holyrood, could unilaterally advance the independence cause in the absence of consent from the UK government. The Supreme Court's ruling in October 2022, which declared that the Scottish Parliament could not legislate for a referendum without Westminster's approval, remains a formidable legal hurdle. Swinney's latest proposal appears to be an attempt to navigate this complex legal landscape by focusing on the political mandate held by his party.
“My position is that if the Scottish National Party wins a majority of seats in the Scottish Parliament, that should be the mandate for us to pursue a referendum,” Swinney stated, emphasizing the democratic weight of such a victory. He further elaborated that this mandate would then be used to “demand a referendum” from the UK government. This suggests a strategy of intensified political pressure, leveraging electoral success to force the issue onto the national agenda.
This new blueprint deviates from the previous, more rigid insistence on securing formal permission from Westminster. For years, the SNP’s strategy centred on seeking a Section 30 order, a mechanism allowing the UK Parliament to devolve powers to Scotland for the specific purpose of holding a referendum. The failure to secure such an order, particularly under Boris Johnson’s premiership, led to frustration and a period of strategic re-evaluation within the party.
The implications of Swinney’s statement are considerable. It positions the SNP’s electoral performance not merely as a measure of public support for independence, but as a direct pathway to initiating a referendum process. This could significantly elevate the stakes of future Scottish Parliament elections, framing them as de facto plebiscites on the constitution.
Navigating the Legal and Political Minefield
However, the legal feasibility of a referendum triggered solely by the SNP’s parliamentary majority remains a significant question mark. While a strong electoral mandate undeniably bolsters the political case for independence, it does not, in itself, create a legal basis for a referendum that would be recognised by the UK government or the courts. The Supreme Court's judgment clearly established that Holyrood’s legislative competence does not extend to matters reserved to the UK Parliament, which includes the constitution.
“We have a democratic mandate from the people of Scotland,” Swinney argued, asserting that this mandate should be respected. He added, “If the Scottish National Party were to win a majority of the seats in the Scottish Parliament, that would be the clearest possible signal that the people of Scotland want to have that choice.”
Political analysts suggest that Swinney’s strategy is a calculated move to maintain momentum and demonstrate a proactive approach to the independence question, even in the face of legal and political obstacles. It’s a delicate balancing act: acknowledging the legal realities while simultaneously asserting the democratic will of the Scottish people as expressed through their elected representatives.
Professor Ailsa Henderson, a leading expert in Scottish politics, commented on the strategy, noting, “This is an attempt to reframe the narrative. Instead of waiting for Westminster’s permission, Swinney is suggesting that the SNP’s electoral success will create an irresistible political pressure. The challenge, of course, will be translating that political pressure into a legally recognised route to a referendum.”
The SNP’s approach has historically been one of seeking a “legal and constitutional route” to independence. Swinney’s latest comments suggest a willingness to explore more direct, albeit potentially less legally watertight, avenues if the traditional path remains blocked. This could lead to increased political confrontation with the UK government, which has consistently refused to grant consent for another referendum.
Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross dismissed the proposal, stating, “This is simply more of the same from the SNP – a desperate attempt to distract from their own failings. The people of Scotland are focused on the economy and public services, not another divisive referendum.” This reaction is indicative of the deep political divide that the independence question continues to represent.
The Road Ahead: Electoral Strategy and Public Opinion
The immediate focus for Swinney and the SNP will undoubtedly be on the next Scottish Parliament elections. The party’s electoral strategy will now be heavily geared towards securing an outright majority, which Swinney has explicitly linked to the pursuit of a new referendum. This raises the stakes for every SNP candidate and amplifies the importance of voter turnout.
However, the success of this strategy hinges on several factors. Firstly, can the SNP actually secure a majority of seats? Recent opinion polls have shown a more mixed picture, with support for the SNP fluctuating and the issue of independence itself facing varying levels of public engagement. Secondly, even with a majority, how will the UK government respond? It is highly unlikely that the current Conservative government would acquiesce to a referendum demand based solely on the SNP’s parliamentary majority, given their firm stance against another vote.
This brings into play the concept of sustained public pressure. Swinney’s proposal implicitly relies on the idea that a clear electoral victory for the SNP will demonstrate a renewed and significant public appetite for independence, making it politically untenable for the UK government to refuse a referendum indefinitely. It’s a gamble on the power of democratic mandate to eventually overcome legal and political intransigence.
The debate over independence is far from over, and John Swinney’s latest pronouncements have injected a new dynamic into the ongoing discussion. By positing the SNP’s parliamentary majority as the decisive factor, he is attempting to create a more direct and immediate pathway to a referendum, even if the legal and political hurdles remain substantial. Whether this strategy will ultimately prove successful in achieving its aims remains to be seen, but it certainly signals a determined effort by the First Minister to keep the independence question at the forefront of Scottish politics.
The coming months will be crucial. The SNP’s performance in future elections, coupled with the evolving political landscape and public opinion on independence, will determine the viability of Swinney’s new blueprint. The strategy places a heavy emphasis on electoral success as the key to unlocking the path to a referendum, a bold move that could reshape the political fortunes of Scotland.
You must be logged in to post a comment.