Rodgers' Bold Gamble: Iheanacho Central, Maeda Wide – Did Celtic's Attacking Puzzle Finally Click?
Brendan Rodgers, a manager known for his tactical nous and willingness to experiment, has often found himself wrestling with Celtic’s attacking output this season. Facing a stern test against Hibernian, the Northern Irishman opted for a striking departure from his usual formations, deploying both Kelechi Iheanacho and Daizen Maeda in unusual roles. The question on everyone’s lips: did this unorthodox setup, with Iheanacho taking a central creative role and Maeda shifted to the right wing, finally unlock the stuttering attack that has plagued the Hoops?
A Stuttering Attack Seeking a Spark
Celtic’s domestic campaign, while still competitive, has been punctuated by periods of frustratingly sterile attacking play. While individual brilliance has occasionally saved the day, a cohesive and consistently potent attacking unit has been elusive. Goals have been harder to come by, and the intricate build-up play that characterized Rodgers' previous tenure has sometimes felt a little predictable. It’s a familiar narrative for any club at the top level facing increased scrutiny and well-drilled opposition. Rodgers, ever the pragmatist, recognized the need for a fresh approach.
The Iheanacho Gambit: A False Nine or a Deep-Lying Forward?
The inclusion of Kelechi Iheanacho in a more central, playmaking role was perhaps the most intriguing aspect of the lineup. Typically deployed as a striker or a forward partner, the Nigerian international was tasked with dropping deeper, linking midfield and attack, and providing a creative spark. Was this a sophisticated false nine system, designed to pull defenders out of position and create space for others? Or was he intended to be a more traditional deep-lying forward, a pivot point for the attacking phases?
His natural ability on the ball, his vision, and his passing range are all well-documented. The hope was that by placing him in this more influential position, he could orchestrate attacks, thread killer passes, and perhaps even find pockets of space to unleash his own shooting threat. It’s a role that demands intelligence, composure, and a high work rate – qualities Iheanacho possesses in abundance. The BBC Sport report highlighted this shift, noting the potential for Iheanacho to be the focal point of Celtic's attacking endeavors.
Maeda on the Right: Trading Pace for Possession?
Daizen Maeda, a player whose relentless energy and pace down the left flank have become a trademark, was surprisingly deployed on the right wing. This move raised eyebrows. Maeda's strengths lie in his directness, his ability to stretch defenses, and his knack for getting in behind. On the left, he often combines with the overlapping left-back, creating a potent attacking threat.
Shifting him to the right suggested a desire to perhaps offer a different dimension to the attack. Could he provide more defensive solidity from that flank? Or was Rodgers looking for him to cut inside and test the opposition with his dribbling and shooting? It’s a less conventional role for Maeda, and one that requires a different kind of tactical discipline. His usual explosive runs from deep might be curtailed, replaced by a more measured approach.
The Hibs Test: Did the Pieces Fit?
The match against Hibernian was the ultimate litmus test for this tactical rejig. Did Iheanacho’s deeper positioning unlock the midfield and create opportunities for runners from deep or wide? Did Maeda’s presence on the right offer a new attacking avenue, or did it stifle his natural game?
Early indications suggested a mixed bag. While Celtic enjoyed periods of possession, the fluidity and incisiveness that Rodgers craves weren’t always evident. Iheanacho, while showing flashes of his quality, found himself in crowded areas, and the connection with the forwards ahead of him wasn't always seamless. The question is, how much time does a new tactical setup truly need to bed in? Football, as we know, waits for no one.
Maeda, on the other hand, seemed to be adapting. His work rate remained immense, and he showed a willingness to track back and support the defense. However, his attacking threat, while present, felt somewhat blunted compared to his usual devastating displays on the opposite flank. Was he being asked to do too much, or was this a calculated risk that simply didn't pay off as hoped?
Analysis: Strengths, Weaknesses, and the Road Ahead
The primary benefit of this setup, if it were to fully click, would be increased creativity and unpredictability. Iheanacho’s ability to dictate play from a deeper position could free up the midfielders and wingers to make more advanced runs. Maeda’s versatility, while perhaps not optimally utilized on the right, could offer a different attacking profile and potentially disrupt opposition defenses accustomed to his usual left-sided threat.
However, the potential drawbacks are also significant. Shifting two key players from their established roles risks disrupting existing chemistry and understanding within the squad. Iheanacho, in a deeper role, might find himself isolated if the midfield doesn't provide adequate support. Maeda, on the right, could struggle to replicate the same level of impact he has on the left, potentially reducing his effectiveness.
The tactical flexibility shown by Rodgers is commendable. It demonstrates a manager not afraid to adapt and evolve. However, the success of such experiments hinges on execution and the players' ability to adapt to new demands. The question for Celtic now is whether this was a one-off tactical adjustment for a specific opponent, or a sign of a more permanent shift in their attacking philosophy.
Ultimately, whether the Iheanacho central and Maeda on the right experiment “worked” is a nuanced question. Did it lead to an immediate explosion of goals and a dominant performance? Perhaps not entirely. But did it offer a glimpse of a different way for Celtic to attack, a potential solution to their recent struggles? That, only time and further analysis will tell. Rodgers will undoubtedly be dissecting the performance, looking for the positives and the areas that need refinement. The quest for a consistently potent attack continues, and this bold tactical gamble was another chapter in that ongoing story.
You must be logged in to post a comment.